AI Seismic & Mining Monitoring Platform

Similarity

0.706

The two recent station windows show moderate similarity, with some shared behaviour and some local differences.

Confidence

MEDIUM

The comparison is usable, but local differences remain visible and should be interpreted cautiously.

Polarity

INVERTED

The two geophones appear to be oriented or wired with opposite polarity relative to each other.

Spectral similarity

0.996

The two stations show very similar spectral energy distribution.

Dominant frequency S2

19.48

Dominant frequency estimated from the current local window.

Dominant frequency S8

19.48

Dominant frequency estimated from the current local window.

Dominant frequency difference

0.0

The dominant frequencies are very close, which supports a similar signal character.

Raw correlation

-0.34

Signed raw correlation may be negative when polarity is inverted.

Best robust correlation

0.667

Best waveform match after robust normalization and lag search.

Best lag (samples)

54

Best relative alignment in sample units.

Best lag (seconds)

0.54

Best relative alignment converted using the configured sampling rate.

RMS balance

0.51

Relative energy comparability between the two local windows.

Peak-to-peak balance

0.536

Relative amplitude range comparability between the two windows.

Deviation index

0.196

Mean absolute difference after robust normalization and alignment.